personally i would rather you express yourself in less offencive and vogue ways.
Zama though he is a noob and as such has a lack of skill in mapping, this does not mean that he is not entitled to his opion. I would agree with him, there is a lack of added detail in this release, compared to the last release and that he has not maped on this map very much for having this node up for over 1/2 a year. This does not make him an a*** ****. He has a valid point, this map looked good at first but there is a lack of update in the last update.
The point being that people need not to be offended or offend (by cursing ppl out) becuase some on does not like the update. I personally, at this point, do not think this map can be any more than a concept map, which i think is fine, this is not going to be a nmp3, it just does not have the flow or rhythm in the basic layout of the map.
I think every one on quad, has the right to comment and rate the way they see fit, even if some would have persecuted them for it. Point being you cannot say some one is wrong based on there maps, its the genetics follicy. ( A incorrect arguement were you say something is untrue based on were it came from).
"i dont update it that often anymore because im not working on it anymore" - MisanthropX
Point proven that even the map editor does not think this update is lacking in content. If a point is well documented and valid, then one must accept the conclusion no matter who it came from.
"i could understand if you vote average minus 1 or 2 for unfinished.. but well. i dont care about that" - MisanthropX
The author of this map conceded that this statement is valid so im not sure why we are attacking crediblity of the reviewer.
Your Lovable Jerk
Ps: Please remove Skiing penguins comment. thanx